<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">geomorf</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Геоморфология и палеогеография</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Geomorfologiya i Paleogeografiya</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2949-1789</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2949-1797</issn><publisher><publisher-name></publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">geomorf-2303</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Дискуссии</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Discussions</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Старые и новые пути развития геоморфологии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Old and new ways of the geomorphology's progress</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Тимофеев</surname><given-names>Д. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Timofeyev</surname><given-names>D. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p> </p><p> </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт географии АН СССР</institution><country>Россия</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>1981</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>09</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title>Геоморфология</issue-title><fpage>31</fpage><lpage>43</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Тимофеев Д.А., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Тимофеев Д.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Timofeyev D.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://geomorphology.igras.ru/jour/article/view/2303">https://geomorphology.igras.ru/jour/article/view/2303</self-uri><abstract><p>Анализ основных путей развития теории геоморфологии, начиная с В. Дэвиса и В. Пенка, показывает, что теоретические основы, заложенные этими учеными, продолжают углубляться и разрабатываться. Наряду с традиционными направлениями исследования рельефа, имеющими аналитический характер, необходимо разрабатывать основы синтетической геоморфологии. Рассмотрены основные проблемы и задачи планетарной геоморфологии, изучения геоморфологических обстановок и геоморфологических рядов, динамики рельефа, рельефа и биосферы, антропогенной геоморфологии и истории развития рельефа.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Main features are discussed of geomorphological theories developed by W. Davis and W. Penck; prospects for the future of geomorphology are estimated. Considering old and new ways of the geomorphology the author describes main tasks of planetary, synthetic, dynamic and historical geomorphology, problems of relief-biosphere connection and human activity significance for morphogenesis. Notions of «geomorphologica1 environments» and «geomorphological series» are introduced. The author comes to the conclusion that there is no crisis in geomorphology's theory nor practice.</p></trans-abstract></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
