Hydrological and climatic characteristics of the Caspian Sea during the Last Glacial Maximum, mid-Holocene and preindustrial conditions according to numerical modelling data
https://doi.org/10.31857/S2949178925010079
EDN: DNWWVY
Abstract
Components of the water balance of the Caspian Sea are calculated for a wide range of lake levels (–85–50 m. a. s. l.) and for the two most contrasting climatic epochs over the last several tens of thousands of years: the middle Holocene (6 ka b. p.) and the Last Glacial Maximum (21 ka b. p.), as well as for the pre-industrial conditions (~1850). The eddy-resolving ocean general circulation model INMIO coupled with the CICE ice model are used for the calculations. Climate data of the INM–CM4.8 model for the indicated periods are used as boundary conditions. It is found that the volumes of river inflow required to maintain the lake level at various marks for the Holocene era are lower than the corresponding pre-industrial values by 6–7%. For the Last Glacial Maximum this decrease is 13–14% for regressive states and 20–21% for transgressive ones. Sensitivity of the results is studied to the temporal resolution of boundary meteorological data and to the locations of fresh water inflow into the Caspian Sea. It is shown that excluding the diurnal and intramonthly variability in input data leads to an underestimation of evaporation from the surface of the sea. The greatest influence on this value is exerted by the exclusion of intramonthly variability of the dynamic wind field: this leads to a decrease in the equilibrium runoff by 35%. To correctly simulate the duration of the ice coverage season, it is necessary to take into account the diurnal cycle of incoming radiation and air temperature. The melting period is significantly lengthened when using data at daily or monthly resolution, which has the greatest impact during transgressive states of the Caspian Sea. The redistribution of river mouth locations along the coast does not significantly affect the value of the total equilibrium inflow, which makes it possible to most likely exclude the uncertainty of this value associated with the lack of data on the mutual ratio of discharge of ancient rivers. In addition, estimates of hydroclimatic characteristics of the Caspian region for the middle Holocene and late Pleistocene are provided based on climate modeling carried out within the framework of the PMIP4 project.
About the Authors
P. A. MorozovaRussian Federation
K. V. Ushakov
Russian Federation
V. A. Semenov
Russian Federation
E. M. Volodin
Russian Federation
R. A. Ibrayev
Russian Federation
References
1. Argus D.F., Peltier W. R., Drummond R. et al. (2014). The Antarctic component of postglacial rebound Model ICE-6G_C (VM5a) based upon GPS positioning, exposure age dating of ice thicknesses and sea level histories. Geophys. J. Int. Vol. 198. No. 1. P. 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu140
2. Brierley C.M., Zhao A., Harrison S.P. et al. (2020) Large-scale features and evaluation of the PMIP4-CMIP6 midHolocene simulations. Clim. Past. Vol. 16. No. 5. P. 1847–1872. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-1847-2020
3. Elguindi N., Somot S., Deque M. et al. (2011) Climate change evolution of the hydrological balance of the Mediterranean, Black and Caspian Seas: impact of climate model resolution. Clim. Dyn. Vol. 36. P. 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0715-4
4. Fadeev R., Ushakov K., Tolstykh M. et al. (2018) Design and development of the SLAV-INMIO-CICE coupled model for seasonal prediction and climate research. Russian Journal of Numerical Analysis and Mathematical Modelling. Vol. 33. No. 6. P.333-340. https://doi.org/10.1515/rnam-2018-0028
5. Gelfan A., Panin A., Kalugin A. et al. (2024) Hydroclimatic processes as the primary drivers of the Early Khvalynian transgression of the Caspian Sea: new developments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.Vol. 28. P. 241–259. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-241-2024
6. Giorgi F. (2019) Thirty years of regional climate modeling: Where are we and where are we going next? Journal of Geophysical Research. Atmospheres. Vol. 124. P. 5696–5723. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030094
7. Griffies S.M., Biastoch A., Böning C. et al. (2009) Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments (COREs). Ocean Modelling. Vol. 26. No. 1–2. P. 1-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.08.007
8. Hajima T., Watanabe M., Yamamoto A. et al. (2020) Development of the MIROC-ES2L Earth system model and the evaluation of biogeochemical processes and feedbacks. Geosci. Model Dev. Vol. 13. P. 2197–2244. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020
9. Hunke E.C., Lipscomb W.H., Turner A.K. et al. (2015) CICE: the Los Alamos Sea Ice Model. Documentation and Software User’s Manual Version 5.1. Los Alamos National Laboratory. 116 p. http://www.ccpo.odu.edu/~klinck/Reprints/PDF/cicedoc2015.pdf (access date: 04.04.2024)
10. Kageyama M., Albani S., Braconnot P. et al. (2017) The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 4: Scientific objectives and experimental design of the PMIP4-CMIP6 Last Glacial Maximum experiments and PMIP4 sensitivity experiments. Geosci. Model Dev. Vol. 10. No. 11. P. 4035–4055. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4035-2017
11. Kageyama M., Harrison S.P., Kapsch M.-L.et al. (2021) The PMIP4 Last Glacial Maximum experiments: preliminary results and comparison with the PMIP3 simulations. Clim. Past. Vol. 17. No. 3. P. 1065–1089. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1065-2021
12. Kalmykov V.V., Ibrayev R.A., Kaurkin M.N. et al. (2018) Compact Modeling Framework v3.0 for high-resolution global ocean–ice–atmosphere models. Geosci. Model Dev. Vol. 11. No. 10. P. 3983-3997. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3983-2018
13. Koriche S.A., Singarayer J.S., Cloke H.L. et al. (2022) What are the drivers of Caspian Sea level variation during the late Quaternary? Quaternary Sci. Rev. Vol. 283. 107457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107457
14. Kurbanov R., Murray A., Thompson W. et al. (2021) First reliable chronology for the Early Khvalynian Caspean Sea transgression in the Lower Volga River valley. Boreas. Vol. 50. P. 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/bor.12478
15. Launiainen J., Vihma T. (1990) Derivation of turbulent surface fluxes – an iterative flux-profile method allowing arbitrary observing heights. Environ. Software. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-9838(90)90021-W
16. Mauritsen T., Bader J., Becker T.et al. (2019) Developments in the MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI-ESM1.2) and its response to increasing CO2. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. Vol. 11. P. 998–1038. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001400
17. Morozova P.A., Ushakov K.V., Semenov V.A. et al. (2021) Water Budget of the Caspian Sea in the Last Glacial Maximum by Data of Experiments with Mathematical Models. Water Resour. Vol. 48. P. 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807821060130
18. Morozova P.A., Ushakov K.V., Semenov V.A. et al. (2024) Water Balance of the Caspian Sea in the Last Glacial Maximum and Pre-Industrial Conditions Based on the Experiments with the INMIO-CICE General Sea Circulation Model. Dokl. Earth Sc. Vol. 515, Part 2. P.675-679. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X23603620
19. Nesterov E.S. (Ed.) . (2016) Water balance and level fluctuations of the Caspian Sea. Modeling and prediction. Moscow: Triada ltd. 378 p. (in Russ.)
20. Nikolaeva R.V., Bortnik V.N. (1994) Characteristics of the interannual and seasonal variability of the water balance components and level of the Caspian Sea during the period of its modern increase. Water Resour. Vol. 21. No. 4/5. P. 410–414. (In Russ.)
21. Peltier W.R., Argus D.F., Drummond R. (2015). Space geodesy constrains ice age terminal deglaciation: The global ICE-6G_C (VM5a) model. J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea. Vol. 120. P. 450–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011176
22. PMIP4 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://pmip4.lsce.ipsl.fr/doku.php/exp_design:index (дата обращения: 04.04.2024).
23. Sidorenko D., Rackow T., Jung T. et al. (2015) Towards multi-resolution global climate modeling with ECHAM6–FESOM. Part I: model formulation and mean climate. Clim. Dynam. Vol. 44. P. 757–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2290-6
24. Ushakov K.V., Ibrayev R.A. (2018) Assessment of mean world ocean meridional heat transport characteristics by a high-resolution model. Russ. J. Earth. Sci. Vol. 18. ES1004. https://doi.org/10.2205/2018ES000616
25. Volodin E.M., Mortikov E.V., Kostrykin S.V. et al. (2018) Simulation of the modern climate using the INMCM48 climate model. Russian Journal of Numerical Analysis and Mathematical Modelling. Vol. 33. No. 6. P. 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1515/rnam-2018-0032
26. Yanina T.A, Sorokin V., Bezrodnykh Yu. et al. (2018) Late Pleistocene climatic events reflected in the Caspian Sea geological history (based on drilling data). Quat. Int. Vol. 465, part A. P. 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.08.003
27. Yanina T. (2020) Environmental variability of the Ponto-Caspian and Mediterranean basins during the last climatic macrocycle. Geography, Environment, Sustainability. Vol. 13. No 4. P. 6–23. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2020-120
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Morozova P.A., Ushakov K.V., Semenov V.A., Volodin E.M., Ibrayev R.A. Hydrological and climatic characteristics of the Caspian Sea during the Last Glacial Maximum, mid-Holocene and preindustrial conditions according to numerical modelling data. Geomorfologiya i Paleogeografiya. 2025;56(1):130-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S2949178925010079. EDN: DNWWVY