INTERACTION OF ENDOGENOUS AND EXOGENOUS PROCESSES IN THE COURSE OF LOCAL MORPHOSTRUCTURES GROWTH
https://doi.org/10.15356/0435-4281-2013-1-3-10
Abstract
Cinematic model based on parabolic equation was used to demonstrate the interaction of endogenous and exogenous processes. Some characteristic morphological features of concurrently degrading and tectonically deforming slopes were described. Par example domed morphostructures pass into cone-like ones, monoclinal slopes are transferred into concave ones; maximal height of the morphostructure does not reach its value conditioned by tectonics. These effects manifestation is proportional to the ratio of exogenous/endogenous deformation rates. As the rise of block morphostructures is equivalent in certain respect to the lowering of denudation basis, these results are applicable to the development of erosion remnants and inselbergs.
About the Author
V. Vad. Bronguleyev
Institute of Geography RAS, Moscow
Russian Federation
Laboratory of geomorphology
Russian Federation
Laboratory of geomorphology
References
1. Bronguleyev V. Vad. 2D kinematic model of piedmont stairs development. DAN, 2008, v. 422, no. 7, pp. 1097–1100 (in Russ).
2. Bronguleyev V. Vad. Several points of stepped slopes development: results of kinematic modelling. Geomorfologiya (Geomorphology RAS), 2009, no. 2, pp. 3–11 (in Russ.).
3. Geological maps. http://www.onegeology.org.
4. Moskovkin V.M., Trofimov A.M. Mathematical model of cut slope development and its application to the slope stability. Geomorfologiya (Geomorphology RAS), 1980, no. 2, pp. 57–65 (in Russ.).
5. Penk V. Morfologicheskiy analiz (Morphological analysis). Moscow: Geografgiz (Publ.), 1961, 359 p.
6. Royhvarger Z.B., Makhinov A.N. Effect of lithological compositional disorder on terrain development. Geomorfologyia (Geomorphology RAS), 1984, no. 1, pp. 79–85 (in Russ.).
7. Timofeyev D.A. Old and new development trends of geomorphology. Geomorfologiya (Geomorphology RAS), 1981, no. 4, pp. 31-44 (in Russ.).
8. Khain V.E. Regionalnaya geotektonika. Alpiyskiy Sredizemnomorskiy poyas (Regional geotectonics. Alpine Mediterranean belt). ?oscow: Nedra (Publ.), 1984, 344 p.
9. Avouac J.-Ph. Analysis of scarp profiles: evaluation of errors in morphologic dating. JGR, 1993, v. 98, no. B4, pp. 6745–6754.
10. Dymond J.R., De Rose R. Modelling landscape evolution in the Waipaoa catchment, New Zealand – A phenomenalogical approach. Geomorphology, 2011, v. 132, pp. 29–34.
11. Hilley G.E., Coutand I. Links between topography, erosion, rheological heterogeneity, and deformation in contractional settings: Insights from the central Andes. Tectonophysics, 2010, v. 495, iss. 1–2, pp. 78–92.
12. Menendes I., Silva P.G., Martin-Betancor M. et al. Fluvial dissection, isistatic uplift, and geomorphological evolution of volcanic islands (Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain). Geomorphology, 2008, v. 102, pp. 189–203.
13. Robert A. Tectonic Geomorphology studies in South Australia: Whyalla’s Scarps and Billa Kalina Basin. http://www.geologie.ens.fr/~arobert/reports/Rapport_AUS3.pdf
14. Yamato P., Mouthereau F., Burov E. Taiwan mountain building: insights from 2-D thermomechanical modelling of a rheologically stratifi ed lithosphere. Geophys. Journ. Int., 2009, v. 176, pp. 307–326
Review
For citations:
Bronguleyev V.V. INTERACTION OF ENDOGENOUS AND EXOGENOUS PROCESSES IN THE COURSE OF LOCAL MORPHOSTRUCTURES GROWTH. Geomorfologiya. 2013;(1):3-10. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15356/0435-4281-2013-1-3-10
Views:
842
Email this article 