Preview

Geomorfologiya i Paleogeografiya

Advanced search

RELATIONS BETWEEN KARST AND THE NEOGENE PALEO-BELAYA VALLEY NETWORK, SOUTHERN CIS-URALS REGION

https://doi.org/10.15356/0435-4281-2017-3-48-59

Abstract

Miocene-Pliocene tectonic movements transformed considerably the landscape of South Urals and drove spatial patterns and intensity of Earth surface processes. Deepening of river valleys in Paleo-Volga and Paleo-Ural drainage systems facilitated ground water action. Geological section in paleo-valleys of Belaya, Ufa, Bystriy Tanysh, Dioma and other rivers includes up to 200 m thick Late Miocene – Pliocene clayey unit that may favor both drainage and screening of aquifers depending on local hydrogeological conditions. In the former case, karst processes are intensified due to the increased pressure gradients and ground water velocities along the sides of paleovalleys that are composed of Carboniferous and Lower Permian gypsum and limestones. In case of shielding, rising flows of highly mineralized water are discharged in the form of large karst springs (“Krasniy Klyuch”, and others.). Along with natural control factors (lithology, tectonics, hydrogeology, etc.), present-day karstic processes development are controlled by economic activity. Karst and suffosion (underground erosion) are often activated by growth of cities and development of new lands. Neogene and modern valleys promote karst development in Lower Permian gypsums in the Ufa agglomeration where 63 karstic fieds were found. In the last 25 years, 70–80% of hazardous cases related to kasrt intensification were induced by technogenic waterlogging. Karstic and suffusion processes threaten the exploitation of Yumaguzinskaya and – Pavlovskaya Hydropower stations that were constructed on karst prone carbonate rocks at the Belaya and Ufa palevalleys.

About the Authors

R. F. Abdrakhmanov
Institute of Geology Ufa Science Centre RAS
Russian Federation
Ufa


V. G. Popov
Institute of Geology Ufa Science Centre RAS
Russian Federation
Ufa


References

1. Shtukenberg A.A. Kazan subsoil water, in Prilozhenie k protokolu Kazanskogo obshchestva estestvoispytatelej (Annex to the Protocol of the Kazan Society of Naturalists), 1892–1893. No. 134. P. 3–17. (in Russ.)

2. Rozhdestvenskiy A.P. Noveyshaya tektonika i razvitie rel’efa Yuzhnogo Priural’ya (Recent tectonics and the landform development in the South CisUral Region). Moscow: Nauka (Publ.), 1971. 304 p. (in Russ.)

3. Danukalova G.A. The regional stratigraphic scheme Miocene Urals and the main events on the territory of South Ural region. Stratigr. Geol. Korrel. 2012. Vol. 20. No. 5. P. 1–18. (in Russ.)

4. Sidnev A.V. Istorija razvitija gidrograficheskoj seti pliocena v Predural’e (The history of the development of the hydrographic network of the Pliocene in the Urals). Moscow: Nauka (Publ.), 1985. 224 p. (in Russ.)

5. Nelidov N.N. Neotectonics of Kazan Zakamye, in Geomorfologija i novejshaja tektonika Volgo-Ural’skoj oblasti i Juzhnogo Urala (Geomorphology and latest tectonics of the Volga-Ural region and the South Urals). Ufa: Bash. branch of Academy of Sciences of USSR (Publ.), 1960. P. 157–164. (in Russ.)

6. Abdrakhmanov R.F., Martin V.I., Popov V.G., Rozhdestvenskii A.P., Smirnov A.I., and Travkin A.I. Karst Bashkortostana (Karst in Bashkortostan). Ufa: Informreklama (Publ.), 2002. p. (in Russ.)

7. Abdrakhmanov R.F. Tehnogenez v podzemnoj gidrosfere Predural’ja (Technogenesis in subsurface hydrosphere of the Urals) Ufa: USC RAS (Publ.), 1993. 208 p. (in Russ.)

8. Lykoshin A.G. Karst i gidrotekhnicheskoe stroitel’stvo (Karst and hydroengineering). Moscow: Strojizdat (Publ.), 1968. 183 p. (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Abdrakhmanov R.F., Popov V.G. RELATIONS BETWEEN KARST AND THE NEOGENE PALEO-BELAYA VALLEY NETWORK, SOUTHERN CIS-URALS REGION. Geomorfologiya. 2017;(3):48-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15356/0435-4281-2017-3-48-59

Views: 521


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-1789 (Print)
ISSN 2949-1797 (Online)