Preview

Geomorfologiya i Paleogeografiya

Advanced search

Methodology of the multiscale assessment of geomorphological safety of seacoasts, on the ex ample of the South-Eastern Baltic coast

https://doi.org/10.31857/S0435-42812019257-67

Abstract

The article presents a methodological  approach  to assessing the geomorphological  safety of sea coasts based on the close interdependence between geomorphological  conditions  and active coastal recreational activities. One of the key stages of the proposed assessment is recreational-geomorphological zoning, which results in separation  of regions, districts and local areas in relation to relief homogeneity  and recreational situation.  The suggested approach is based on the quantitative  indicators of the environment — conditions of relief formation  and the geomorphological  properties of the territory. Group  of criteria for the situation of relief formation  includes lithological, hydrometeorological, human and social factors. Among the group of geomorphological  criteria  are: morphometric characteristics  of the  coast,  the  dynamics  of the  coast and the activity of slope processes. Resultant  geomorphological  safety was classified into three classes: the most suitable areas for recreation;  territories  subject to further refinement;  and inconvenience  territories that cannot  be used at all. The results of the geomorphological  safety assessment are designed to increase the  effectiveness of recreational  environmental  planning.  The  suggested principles  of geomorphological assessment can be used not only for the Baltic region, but almost for any coastal region, which may require some correction of criteria.

About the Authors

I. V. Abdullaeva
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography
Russian Federation
Moscow.


A. V. Bredikhin
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography
Russian Federation
Moscow.


References

1. Bredikhin A. V., Bolysov S. I., and Eremenko E. A. Geomorphological security of Russia, in VII Schukinskie chteniya (Proc. of VII Schukin Readings). M.: MAKS Press (Publ.), 2015. P. 11–18.

2. Kuzmin S. B. Opasnye geomorfologicheskie protsessy i risk prirodopolzovaniya (Hazardous geomorphological processes and the risk of environmental management). Novosibirsk: GEO (Publ.), 2009. 196 p.

3. Cardinali M., Reichenbach P., Guzzetti F., Ardizzone F., Antonini G., Galli M., Cacciano M., Castellani M., and Salvati P. A geomorphological approach to the estimation of landslide hazards and risks in Umbria, Central Italy. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 2002. No. 2. P. 57–72.

4. Reynard E., Coratza P., and Regolini-Bissing G. Geomorphosites. Verlag Dr. Friendich Pfeil, Munchen, 2009, 233 p.

5. Likhacheva E. A. and Timofeev D. A. Ekologicheskaya Geomorfologiya (Ecological geomorphology). M: Media Press (Publ.), 2004. 239 p.

6. Abdullaeva I. V. and Bredikhin A. V. Geomorphological safety of the recreational activity of the Kaliningrad region, in Teoriya i metody sovremennoy geomorfologii (Proc. of conf. “Theory and methods of modern geomorphology”. XXXV Plenum of the Geomorphological Committee of the RAS). Simferopol, 2016. Vol. 2. P. 317–323.

7. Bredikhin A. V. Rekreatsionnye i geomorfologicheskie sistemy (Recreation and geomorphological systems). Smolensk: Oikumena (Publ.), 2010. 328 p.

8. Voskresensky S. S., Leontyev O. K., and Spiridonov A. I. Geomorfologicheskoe rayonirovanie SSSR (Geomorphological zoning of the USSR). M: Vysshaya shkola (Publ.), 1980. 343 p.

9. Abdullaeva I. V. and Bredikhin A. V. Recreation and geomorphological zoning of the southeastern Baltic. Probl. Region. Eckol. 2018. No. 2. P. 119–123 (in Russ.).

10. Boldyrev V. L., Bobykina V. P., and Burnashov E. M. State of the shores of the Curonian Spit after the storm period, in Problemy izucheniya i ohrany prirodnogo i kulturnogo naslediya natsionalnogo parka “Kurshskaya kosa” (Problems of study and protection of the natural and cultural heritage of the National Park “Curonian Spit”: Sat. scientific articles). Iss. 6. Kaliningrad: RSU im. I. Kanta (Publ.), 2008. P. 105–114.

11. Burnashov E. M. Sovremennaya dinamika i geoekologicheskoe sostoyanie morskogo berega Kaliningradskoy oblasti (Modern dynamics and geoecological state of the sea coast of the Kaliningrad region). PhD thesis. Barnaul: FGOU VPO “KSTU” (Publ.), 2011. 205 p.

12. Ryabkova O. I. Dinamika beregov Sambiyskogo poluostrova i Kushskoy kosy v svyazi s problemami beregozaschity (The dynamics of the coasts of the Sambian Peninsula and the Curonian Spit in connection with the problems of coastal protection). PhD thesis. M.: MGU Publ., 1987. 306 p.

13. Zaznobina N. I. Assessment of the environmental situation in a large industrial center by the degree of anthropogenic load using the generalized desirability function (using the example of the city of Nizhny Novgorod). Vestn. Nizhegor. Univ. 2007. No. 2. P. 115–118 (in Russ.).

14. Ivashina N. V. Methodology for assessing the competitiveness of the regional fish complex based on the desirability function. Vestn. TGEU. 2005. No. 3. P. 26–39 (in Russ.).

15. Strusińska-Correia A. Beach Stabilization at Kołobrzeg, Poland. Journal of Coastal Research. Florida, US. 2014. No. 71. P. 131–142.


Review

For citations:


Abdullaeva I.V., Bredikhin A.V. Methodology of the multiscale assessment of geomorphological safety of seacoasts, on the ex ample of the South-Eastern Baltic coast. Geomorfologiya. 2019;(2):57-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0435-42812019257-67

Views: 297


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-1789 (Print)
ISSN 2949-1797 (Online)