A new approach to complex relief assessment for effective environmental management
https://doi.org/10.31857/S043542812101003X
Abstract
A new approach to complex assessment of relief for environmental management based on quantitative index of geomorphological safety is developed. The «geomorphological safety» concept, and its implementation as a special type of natural safety is fully determined and proved. The short review of scientific works in the field of risk assessment of geomorphological hazards, stability and vulnerability is provided. An algorithm for conducting a comprehensive assessment of geomorphological safety based on a balanced consideration of factors and conditions of relief development in a particular territory is presented. The procedure and result of evaluation, also the significance of introducing weight coefficients in order to take into account the specifics of land-use are demonstrated using the example of a large-scale assessment of the geomorphological safety of agriculture and mining at a key site in the south of Moscow region. For plain and mountainous topography, as well as for the bottom of the World ocean, the specificity of the assessment procedure by the developed method is emphasized. An overview of significant criteria that should be taken into account when calculating the geomorphological safety index at different scales is given.
Supporting agencies: The study was founded by the State Program (№ АААА-А16-116032810089-5) “Evolution of the environment, relief dynamics and geomorphological safety of environmental management”.
About the Authors
E. A. Eremenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Moscow
Y. R. Belyaev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Moscow
S. I. Bolysov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Moscow
V. I. Myslivets
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Moscow
A. V. Bredikhin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geography, Moscow
References
1. Obzor Iokogamskoi strategii i Plana deistvyi po obespecheniju bolee bezopasnogo mira (Review of the Yokohama strategy and Action plan for providing safer world). Kobe. 2004. 30 p. (in Russ.)
2. Prirodnye opasnosti Rossii. Tom. 5. Ocenka i upravlenie prirodnymi riskami (Natural dangers of Russia. Vol. 5. Assessment and management of natural risks). A.L. Ragozin (Eds.). M.: KRUK (Publ.), 2003. 320 p. (in Russ.)
3. Koshkarev A.V., Kozlova A.E., Likhacheva E.A., Merzlyakova I.A., Timofeev D.A., and Chesnokova I.V. Geomorfologicheskaya opasnost' i risk. (Geomorphological danger and risk). Izvestia AN. Seriya Geogr. 2001. No. 5. P. 1–8. (in Russ.)
4. Kurbatova A.S., Myagkov S.M., and Shnyparkov A.L. Prirodnyi risk dlya gorodov Rossii (Natural risk for the cities of Russia). M.: NiiPI ekologii goroda (Publ.), 1997. 240 p. (in Russ.)
5. Federal’nyi zakon “O bezopasnosti” (Federal law “About Safety”) No. 2446-1-FZ. 1992.
6. Federal’nyi zakon “O bezopasnosti” (Federal law “About Safety”) No. 390-FZ. 2010.
7. Doklad Vsemirnoi konferentsii OON po umen’sheniyu opasnosti stikhiinykh bedstvii. (Report of the UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction). Iokogama. 1994. 57 p. (in Russ.)
8. Bezopasnost’ Rossii. Pravovye, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie i nauchno-tekhnicheskie aspekty. (Safety of Russia. Legal, social and economic and scientific and technical aspects). M.: Znanie (Publ.), 1999. 703 p. (in Russ.)
9. Kruzhalin V.I. Ekologo-geomorfologicheskii analiz territorii. (Eco-geomorphological analysis of the territory). Vestnik MGU. Ser. 5. Geograiya. 1997. No. 4. P. 11–15. (in Russ.)
10. Chalov R.S. and Chernov A.V. Raionirovanie territorii Rossii po ekologicheskomu sostoyaniyu rechnykh rusel i poim. (Geographical zoning of Russia on an ecological condition of river channels and floodplains). Problemy otsenki ekologicheskoi napryazhennosti territorii Rossii: faktory, raionirovanie. M.: MGU (Publ.), 1993. P. 66–72. (in Russ.)
11. Krasheninnikova S.V. K voprosu ob ekologo-geomorfologicheskoi otsenke territorii goroda. (About eco-geo morphological assessment of the territory of the city). Izvestiya PGPU. Estestvennye nauki. 2006. No. 1 (5). P. 150–154. (in Russ.)
12. Dmitriev V.V. Opredelenie integral’nogo pokazatelya sostoyaniya prirodnogo ob’ekta kak slozhnoi sistemy. (Definition of a complex index of a condition of a natural object as a complex system). Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie. 2009. No. 4. P. 146–165. (in Russ.)
13. Bityukova V.R. Integral’naya otsenka ekologicheskoi situatsii gorodov Rossii. (Integrated assessment of an ecological situation of the cities of Russia). Regional’nye issledovaniya. 2014. No. 4. P. 49–57. (in Russ.)
14. Lebedeva E.V., Shvarev S.V., and Gotvanskii V.I. Prirodno-obuslovlennaya napryazhennost' geomorfologicheskikh protsessov territorii Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii. (The natural caused tension of geomorphological processes of the territory of the Far East of Russia). Geomorfologiya (Geomorphology RAS). 2014. No. 4. P. 48–59. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15356/0435-4281-2014-4-48-59
15. Lebedeva E.V., Mikhalev D.V., and Shvarev S.V. Napryazhennost’ geomorfologicheskikh obstanovok tsentral’nogo sektora gornoi sistemy And. (Tension of geomorphological situations of the central sector of Andes). Geomorfologiya (Geomorphology RAS). 2015. No. 2. P. 77–88. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15356/0435-4281-2015-2-77-88
16. Likhacheva E.A., Shvarev S.V., and Anikina N.V. Geomorfologicheskaya otsenka territorial’nykh resursov Novoi Moskvy. (Geomorphological assessment of territorial resources of New Moscow). Geomorfologiya (Geomorphology RAS). 2015. No. 1. P. 77–87. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15356/0435-4281-2015-1-77-87
17. Simonov Yu.G., Kruzhalin V.I., and Simonova T.Yu. Metody diagnostiki ekologicheski opasnykh vozdeistvii na rel’ef. (Methods of diagnostics of ecologically dangerous impacts on a relief). Inzhenerno-geomorfologicheskie issledovaniya. G.A. Saf’yanov (Ed.). M.: MGU (Publ.), 1995. P. 177–184. (in Russ.)
18. Likhacheva E.A., Bakhireva L.V., Stankovyanski M., and Urbanek Ya. Otsenka sostoyaniya gorodskoi morfolitosistemy (na primere Moskvy i Bratislavy). (Assessment of a condition of urban geomorphological systems (on the example of Moscow and Bratislava)). Geomorfologiya (Geomorphology RAS). 1991. No. 1. P. 30–42. (in Russ.)
19. Tratsevskaya E.Yu. Otsenka geologicheskikh riskov na territorii g. Gomel’. (Assessment of geological risks in the territory of Gomel). Geoekologiya, inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya. 2006. No. 2. P. 124–134. (in Russ.)
20. Anikeev A.V., Ragozin A.L., and Seleznev V.N. Otsenka geologicheskogo riska na uchastke gorodskogo stroitel’stva. (Assessment of geological risk on the site of construction). Geoekologiya, inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya. 2007. No. 6. P. 547–560. (in Russ.)
21. Bondarik G.K., Ierusalimskaya E.N., and Jarg L.A. Osobennosti metodiki otsenki riska ekzogennykh geologicheskikh protsessov na regional’nom urovne. (Features of a procedure of assessment of risk of exogenous geological processes at the regional level). Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Geologiya i razvedka. 2006. No. 1. P. 48–52. (in Russ.)
22. Matsii S.I. and Bezuglova E.V. Opolznevaya opasnost' i risk smeshchenii gruntov na sklonakh. (Landslide hazard and risk of shifts of soil on slopes). Geoekologiya, inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya. 2007. No. 6. P. 537–546. (in Russ.)
23. Laperdin V.K. and Kachura R.A. Kriogennye opasnosti v zonakh lineinykh prirodno-tekhnicheskikh kompleksov na yuge Vostochnoi Sibiri. (Cryogenic dangers in zones of linear technical complexes in the south of Eastern Siberia). Kriosfera Zemli. 2009. Vol. XIII. No. 2. P. 27–34. (in Russ.)
24. Zerkal’ O.V. Otsenka geologicheskikh riskov v praktike inzhenernykh izyskanii. (Assessment of geological risks in practice of engineering research). Inzhenernye izyskaniya. 2009. No. 9. P. 40–43. (in Russ.)
25. Viktorov A.S. Kolichestvennaya otsenka prirodnykh opasnostei na osnove metodov matematicheskoi morfologii landshafta. (Quantitative assessment of natural dangers on the basis of methods of mathematical morphology of a landscape). Geoekologiya, inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya. 2005. No. 4. P. 291–297. (in Russ.)
26. Kozlovskii S.V. and Sheshenya N.L. Prognozirovanie geologicheskikh opasnostei i riska ikh proyavlenii, kak sostavnaya chast' prostranstvenno-vremennoi sistemy. (Forecasting of geological dangers and risk of their manifestations as an integral part of the space-time system). Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Geologiya i razvedka. 2010. No. 6. P. 59–61. (in Russ.)
27. Bondarik G.K., Ierusalimskaya E.N., and Jarg L.A. Ob’ektivnaya otsenka ustoichivosti geologicheskoi sredy k tekhnogennym vzaimodeistviyam i priemy ee korrektnogo kartografirovaniya. (Objective assessment of resistance of the geological environment to technogenic interactions and methods of its correct mapping). Inzhenernaya geologiya. 2008. No. 4. P. 4–13. (in Russ.)
28. Molodykh I.I. and Sirotkin D.V. Zadachi, problemy, perspektivy inzhenerno-geologicheskogo kartografirovaniya i ekologicheskaya bezopasnost' territorii. (Tasks, problems, prospects of engineering-geological mapping and ecological safety of territories). Razvedka i okhrana nedr. 2014. No. 8. P. 40–43. (in Russ.)
29. Shnyparkov A.L., Koltermann P.K., Seliverstov Yu.G., Sokratov S.A., and Perov V.F. Selevoi risk na Chernomorskom poberezh’e Kavkaza. (Mudflow risk on the Black Sea coast of the Caucasus). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 5. Geografiya. 2013. No. 3. P. 42–48. (in Russ.)
30. Osipov V.I. Tekhnogenez i sovremennye zadachi nauk o Zemle. (Tekhnogenesis and modern problems of Earth sciences). Ekologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii. 2016. Vyp. 20. No. 3. P. 4–12. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2016-3-4-12
31. Grokhol’skii N.S. Metodika opredeleniya integral’nogo riska ekzogennykh geologicheskikh protsessov. (Technique of determination of integrated risk of exogenous geological processes). Georisk. 2013. No. 2. P. 46–47. (in Russ.)
32. Bolysov S.I., Bredikhin A.V., and Eremenko E.A. Kompleksnaya melkomasshtabnaya otsenka geomorfologicheskoi bezopasnosti Rossii. (Complex small-scale as sessment of geomorphological safety of Russia). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 5. Geografiya. 2016. No. 2. P. 3–12. (in Russ.)
33. Azgal’dov G.V. and Raikhman E.P. O kvalimetrii. (Qualimetry). M.: Izdatel’stvo standartov. 1973. 172 p. (in Russ.)
34. Kovalev V.V. and Volkova A.N. Analiz khozyaistvennoi deyatel’nosti predpriyatiya. (Analysis of economic activity of the enterprise). M.: TK Velbi (Publ.), 2002. 424 p. (in Russ.)
35. Bityukova V.R. and Kirillov P.L. Metody kompleksnoi otsenki regional’nykh razlichii ekologicheskoi napryazhennosti v Rossii. (Methods for a complex assessment of regional differences in ecological tension in Russia). Regional’nye issledovaniya. 2011. No. 1. P. 56–69. (in Russ.)
36. Bolysov S.I., Bredikhin A.V., and Eremenko E.A. Podkhody k otsenke geomorfologicheskoi bezopasnosti territorii. (Approaches to assessment of geomorphological safety of territories). Voprosy geografii. Sb. 140. Sovremennaya geomorfologiya. 2015. P. 29–55. (in Russ.)
37. Ekologicheskaya geomorfologiya. Klyuchevye napravleniya. (Ecological geomorphology. Key directions). S.I. Bolysov (Ed.). M.: Geograficheskii fakul’tet MGU (Publ.), 2013. 168 p. (in Russ.)
38. Zvorykin K.V. Geograficheskaya kontseptsiya prirodopol’zovaniya. (The geographical concept of land-use). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 5. Geografiya. 1993. No. 3. P. 3–15. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Eremenko E.A., Belyaev Y.R., Bolysov S.I., Myslivets V.I., Bredikhin A.V. A new approach to complex relief assessment for effective environmental management. Geomorfologiya. 2021;52(1):19-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S043542812101003X
Views:
366
Email this article 